DODAF 2.0 VOLUME 1 PDF
Section 1 is the Introduction to this volume. Section 2 .. These DoDAF data groups support both DoDAF viewpoints and the DoD key processes: the Joint. DoDAF Volume 2 describes the technical aspects of data collection presentation descriptions and DoDAF-described Models in Volumes 1 and 2 provide guidance DoDAFV is intended to be methodology agnostic. DoDAF Architecture Framework Version The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . OV-1 High Level Operational Concept Graphic: High level graphical and .. DoDAF V · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 1 · Printable version of DoDAF V Volume 2.
|Published (Last):||6 January 2017|
|PDF File Size:||3.55 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.
The repository is defined by the common database schema Core Architecture Data Model 2. Views Read Edit View history. This page was last edited on 3 Octoberat It broadened the applicability of architecture tenets and practices to all Mission Dodaff rather than just the C4ISR community.
Systems and services view SV is a set of graphical and textual products that describe systems and services and interconnections providing for, or supporting, DoD functions.
Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:.
As one example, the DoDAF v1. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations. The DoDAF provides a foundational framework for developing and representing architecture descriptions that ensure a ddodaf denominator for understanding, comparing, and integrating architectures across organizational, joint, and multinational boundaries.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework
These views relate to stakeholder requirements for producing an Architectural Description. In addition to graphical representation, there is typically a requirement to provide metadata to the Defense Information Technology Portfolio Repository DITPR or other architectural repositories. The actual sequence of view generation and their potential customization is a function of the application domain and the specific needs of the effort.
These views offer overview and details aimed to specific stakeholders within their domain and in interaction with other domains in which the system will operate. It establishes a basis for semantic i. This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.
Retrieved from ” https: United States Department of Defense information technology Enterprise architecture frameworks. DoDAF generically describes in the representation of the artifacts to be generated, but allows considerable flexibility regarding the specific formats and modeling techniques. The figure represents the information dodar links the operational view, systems and services view, and technical standards view. In April the Version 1. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1.
In other projects Wikimedia Commons. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: The approach xodaf on the requirements and the expected results; i.
These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment. All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of the entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture. Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”.
TRAK Community :: Wiki :: DODAF
Node is a complex, logical concept that is represented with more concrete concepts. In this manner, the DM2 supports the exchange vllume reuse of architectural information among JCAs, Components, and Federal and Coalition partners, thus facilitating the understanding and dodaff of interoperability of processes and systems.
DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them. These products are organized under four views:. The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set. Commons category link is on Wikidata. There are many different approaches for creating an integrated architecture using DoDAF and for determining which products are required.
As the DM2 matures to meet the ongoing data requirements of process owners, decision makers, architects, and new technologies, it will evolve to a resource that more completely supports the requirements for architectural data, published in a consistently understandable way, and will enable greater ease for discovering, sharing, and reusing architectural data across organizational boundaries. Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions.
It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.
Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia
The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.
The OV provides textual and graphical representations of operational nodes and elements, assigned tasks and vokume, and information flows between nodes. It addressed the Deputy Secretary of Defense directive that a DoD-wide effort be undertaken to define and develop a better means and process for ensuring that C4ISR capabilities were interoperable and met the needs of the warfighter.
The concept of capability, as defined by its Meta-model Data Group allows one to answer questions such as:.
In simpler terms, integration is seen in the connection from items common among architecture products, where items shown in one architecture product such as sites used or systems interfaced or services provided should have the identical number, name, and meaning appear in related architecture product views.
The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration vilume federation of Architectural Descriptions.
These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means. Otherwise there is the risk of producing products with no customers. Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture.
Each view depicts certain perspectives of an architecture as described below. DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF. SV products focus on specific physical systems with specific physical geographical locations. Each of these three levels of the DM2 is important to a particular viewer of Departmental processes:.