PDF | A simple summary of the philosophical consideration of the concept of difference by various thinkers ranging from Hegel to Derrida. Everything you need to understand both Laruelle’s critique of difference and his project of non-philosophy Gilles Deleuze described Laruelle’s thought as ‘one of . Everything you need to understand both Laruelle’s critique of difference and his project of non-philosophyGBS_insertPreviewButtonPopup ([‘ISBN

Author: Shadal Nikorn
Country: Sao Tome and Principe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Travel
Published (Last): 23 June 2017
Pages: 283
PDF File Size: 11.61 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.4 Mb
ISBN: 533-3-42428-937-3
Downloads: 29268
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulull


Dejan Vasic marked it as to-read Apr 13, In Chapter 6, “Critique of Difference,” Laruelle shifts toward a positive development of his own theories, and does not wait long to communicate his audacity. Robert Edward Sherwood-Moore – unknown.

From Laruelle’s innovative theoretical perspective, the forms of philosophical difference that emerge appear as variations upon a unique, highly abstract structure of philosophical decision, the self-posing and self-legitimating essence of philosophy itself. Becky rated it really liked it Oct 12, Laruelle’s general term for his work is “non-philosophy,” and the implicit historical claim is lqruelle radical as it sounds.

Google Books no proxy Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University’s proxy server Configure custom proxy use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy.

Trivia About Philosophies of D Laruell from the tone of a mystic to that of a misanthropic Lex Luthor or Grand Moff Tarkin, Laruelle refers to past philosophers as “larvae,” whose larkelle.


Philosophies of Difference: A Critical Introduction to Non-Philosophy by Fran├žois Laruelle

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Laruelle then uses this analysis to introduce a new theoretical practice of non-philosophical thought. This book deals with the holiest cows of contemporary continental thought Nietzsche, Derrida, Heidegger and Deleuze in an incredible way. Difference as reality is found in Heideggerian finitude, where something always withdraws behind the immanent play of forces in the world.

Marcell Mars added it Jan 09, The fact that these candidate figures have mostly been French for the past seventy years is not a sign of deluded Francophilia, but of a long yet temporary historical phase in which frenetic activity in Paris has been matched by an ebbing trickle of original continental thinkers from the German-speaking world, and the failure so far of important new capitals to emerge.

Nicholson – – Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 4: Alan marked it as to-read Aug 26, This article has no associated abstract.

We stand helpless before such remarks as: Samuel Cooke rated it really liked it Oct 15, Mitch rated it liked it Aug 19, This creates a new sort of gap, different from that between empirical or ideal, in which the law is taken for real.

Paul added it Sep 04, Laruelle’s “my philosophy is not philosophy” act is unconvincing but I don’t mind playing along since Ethics of the Stranger was a great take on ethics and one o my all time favorite books. Tom marked it as to-read Aug 06, Levin Ahmad marked it as to-read Jul 17, Cole – – Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 Born in the same year as the already famous Alain Badiouhe is no longer young.


Immediate contact with the One is the irreducible “mystic” condition for every philosophy — but not a “mystical” condition, since no superior form of initiation or spiritual praxis is required. But at least Badiou made room for numerous peers in the kingdom: Rocco Gangle – – Angelaki 19 2: History of Western Philosophy.

Philosophies of Difference: A Critical Introduction to Non-philosophy: Francois Laruelle: Continuum

Nor is Laruelle always polite in this claim. David rated it liked it Feb 07, In philosophies of difference the autopositioning of an ideal-real mixture, always the fundamental characteristic of philosophical thought, the ‘decision’ characterising this thought, didference perpetually reconstituted for philosophies of difference soley in the mode of its overcoming.

Alan marked it as to-read Jun 13, Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.